Okno vs CloudCannon
Pick CloudCannon for a Git-based site on Hugo, Jekyll or Eleventy where you also want the hosting handled. Otherwise you are paying €512 a year for what Okno never charges more than €200 a year for, in your own repository, with nothing to run.
| What is being compared | CloudCannon | Okno |
|---|---|---|
| Content lives | In your own files | In your repository, next to the code |
| If you leave | Your files, you keep them | Nothing to move. You already have it all |
| Each extra editor | €104 a year past 3 | Free, however many |
| Caps | None on this plan | None |
| Free | Not a live site | Everything, but on your own machine only |
| You pay | Every month | Only on a day you edit the live site, max €200 a year |
Where CloudCannon wins
- Yes: Git-based visual editing on Jekyll, Hugo and Eleventy, which Okno cannot run
- Yes: Hosting and the build pipeline come with it
What it costs
CloudCannon Standard
€512 €392 more each year
Okno Free while you build
€120 never more than €200 a year
CloudCannon costs about 4.3× as much for that site.
Compare something else
Standard plan, publicly listed price as of June 2026, normalised to euros and annualised, priced for 1 editor, 1 language and 10 collections. Check CloudCannon's own pricing page before relying on it. See something off? support@okno.build.