Okno vs Keystatic
Pick Keystatic for a free Git-based editor with typed schemas, when an admin route is good enough. Otherwise Okno keeps the content in your own repository, next to the code, and leaves you nothing to run.
| What is being compared | Keystatic | Okno |
|---|---|---|
| Content lives | In your own files | In your repository, next to the code |
| If you leave | Your files, you keep them | Nothing to move. You already have it all |
| Edits on the live page | No | Yes |
| Caps | None on this plan | None |
| Free | All of it | Everything, but on your own machine only |
| You pay | Nothing | Only on a day you edit the live site, max €200 a year |
Where Keystatic wins
- Yes: Free, Git-based, with schemas written in TypeScript
- Yes: Local mode needs no account at all
Where Okno wins
- Yes: Keystatic edits in a React admin app at its own route. Okno edits the page a visitor is looking at.
- Yes: Keystatic gives an editor a form built from your schema. Okno gives them the page, with the change visible as they type.
What it costs
Keystatic Open source
Free you run the server
Okno Free while you build
€120 never more than €200 a year
Compare something else
Open source plan, publicly listed price as of June 2026, normalised to euros and annualised, priced for 1 editor, 1 language and 10 collections. This one has not been re-checked since that scan. Capability rows checked 2026-07-21 against Keystatic's own documentation; only what someone has looked at is listed, so a blank is not a no. Check Keystatic's own pricing page before relying on it. See something off? support@okno.build.