Okno vs Contentful
Pick Contentful for a large team whose content feeds several products at once, with a budget to match. Otherwise you are paying €3,132 a year for what Okno never charges more than €200 a year for, in your own repository, with nothing to run.
| What is being compared | Contentful | Okno |
|---|---|---|
| Content lives | On their servers | In your repository, next to the code |
| If you leave | Export it, then rebuild elsewhere | Nothing to move. You already have it all |
| Edits on the live page | No | Yes |
| Caps | 20 editors, 3 languages, 50 collections, then sales | None |
| Free | A live site, with caps | Everything, but on your own machine only |
| You pay | Every month | Only on a day you edit the live site, max €200 a year |
Where Contentful wins
- Yes: Feeds many apps at once from one content store, at scale
- Yes: Approval steps and scheduled releases for a large editorial team
- Yes: A long list of ready-made integrations
What it costs
Contentful Lite
€3,132 €3,012 more each year
Okno Free while you build
€120 never more than €200 a year
Contentful costs about 26.1× as much for that site.
Compare something else
Lite plan, publicly listed price as of June 2026, normalised to euros and annualised, priced for 1 editor, 1 language and 10 collections. Capability rows checked 2026-07-21 against Contentful's own documentation; only what someone has looked at is listed, so a blank is not a no. Check Contentful's own pricing page before relying on it. See something off? support@okno.build.