Okno vs Sanity
Pick Sanity for a team that wants to shape the editing tool as much as the site. Otherwise you are paying €157 a year for what Okno never charges more than €200 a year for, in your own repository, with nothing to run.
| What is being compared | Sanity | Okno |
|---|---|---|
| Content lives | On their servers | In your repository, next to the code |
| If you leave | Export it, then rebuild elsewhere | Nothing to move. You already have it all |
| Edits on the live page Clicking the page is quick, but the typing happens in the Studio form beside it. | No | Yes |
| Each extra editor | €157 a year past 0 | Free, however many |
| Caps | 50 editors, then sales | None |
| Free | A live site, with caps | Everything, but on your own machine only |
| You pay | Every month | Only on a day you edit the live site, max €200 a year |
Where Sanity wins
- Yes: Several people editing the same document at once
- Yes: The editing interface itself is yours to build, in React
- Yes: GROQ queries over deeply structured content
What it costs
Sanity Growth
€157 €37 more each year
Okno Free while you build
€120 never more than €200 a year
Compare something else
Growth plan, publicly listed price as of June 2026, normalised to euros and annualised, priced for 1 editor, 1 language and 10 collections. Capability rows checked 2026-07-21 against Sanity's own documentation; only what someone has looked at is listed, so a blank is not a no. Check Sanity's own pricing page before relying on it. See something off? support@okno.build.