Okno vs DatoCMS
Pick DatoCMS for an image-heavy site in several languages that wants media handled for it. Otherwise you are paying €1,788 a year for what Okno never charges more than €200 a year for, in your own repository, with nothing to run.
| What is being compared | DatoCMS | Okno |
|---|---|---|
| Content lives | On their servers | In your repository, next to the code |
| If you leave | Export it, then rebuild elsewhere | Nothing to move. You already have it all |
| Each extra editor | €108 a year past 10 | Free, however many |
| Each extra language | €228 a year past 5 | Free, however many |
| Caps | 100 editors, 10 languages, 200 collections, then sales | None |
| Free | A live site, with caps | Everything, but on your own machine only |
| You pay | Every month | Only on a day you edit the live site, max €200 a year |
Where DatoCMS wins
- Yes: A strong image pipeline and media CDN
- Yes: A well-built model for translated content
What it costs
DatoCMS Professional
€1,788 €1,668 more each year
Okno Free while you build
€120 never more than €200 a year
DatoCMS costs about 14.9× as much for that site.
Compare something else
Professional plan, publicly listed price as of June 2026, normalised to euros and annualised, priced for 1 editor, 1 language and 10 collections. Check DatoCMS's own pricing page before relying on it. See something off? support@okno.build.