Okno vs Hygraph
Pick Hygraph for a team whose content has to merge with other systems behind one API. Otherwise you are paying €2,078 a year for what Okno never charges more than €200 a year for, in your own repository, with nothing to run.
| What is being compared | Hygraph | Okno |
|---|---|---|
| Content lives | On their servers | In your repository, next to the code |
| If you leave | Export it, then rebuild elsewhere | Nothing to move. You already have it all |
| Caps | 10 editors, 3 languages, 40 collections, then sales | None |
| Free | A live site, with caps | Everything, but on your own machine only |
| You pay | Every month | Only on a day you edit the live site, max €200 a year |
Where Hygraph wins
- Yes: Joins several sources into one GraphQL API
- Yes: GraphQL-native from the ground up, not bolted on
What it costs
Hygraph Growth
€2,078 €1,958 more each year
Okno Free while you build
€120 never more than €200 a year
Hygraph costs about 17.3× as much for that site.
Compare something else
Growth plan, publicly listed price as of June 2026, normalised to euros and annualised, priced for 1 editor, 1 language and 10 collections. Check Hygraph's own pricing page before relying on it. See something off? support@okno.build.